RE: unique row identifier data type exhausted . . .
От | Andrew Snow |
---|---|
Тема | RE: unique row identifier data type exhausted . . . |
Дата | |
Msg-id | NHEALMDKDACEIPBNOOOCCEMMCCAA.als@fl.net.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: unique row identifier data type exhausted . . . (Tom Cook <tcook@lisa.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: unique row identifier data type exhausted . . .
|
Список | pgsql-general |
> Is this necessarily a good solution? If you use 64-bit OIDs, some joker > will just hook up a several-terra-byte disk array to his machine, try to > store the location of every molecule in the universe and break it. If you have to have OIDs at all, its a lot better than a 32 bit number. I think it would be easier to switch to 64 bit OIDs than ditch them completely. The "serial" type should definitely be 64 bit. To make matters worse I believe its really only a 31 bit number as the plus/minus symbol is discarded. But I think moving to 64 bit will take place soon enough, when it needs to, and it should shut everyone up. > "Christ died for sin, the righteous for the unrighteous, to bring > you to God." > - 1 Peter 3:18 Is it just me, or are there a lot of Christian PostgreSQL users? ;-) (I'm not knocking it, I'm one too..) - Andrew
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: