Re: Mysql date/time, was Re: Press Release -- Just
От | Jason Hihn |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Mysql date/time, was Re: Press Release -- Just |
Дата | |
Msg-id | NGBBLHANMLKMHPDGJGAPOEBKCAAA.jhihn@paytimepayroll.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Mysql date/time, was Re: Press Release -- Just Waiting for Tom (Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Mysql date/time, was Re: Press Release -- Just
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Oh, that is interesting... But that is not a datetime. Timestamp (in case you don't know, though you probably do already)will automatically update itself when the row is edited, but it only works on the first one. I learned that thehard way. They consider this a "feature" as well, but it looks intentional... -J -----Original Message----- From: Richard Huxton [mailto:dev@archonet.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 5:48 AM To: Jason Hihn Cc: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org Subject: Mysql date/time, was Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Press Release -- Just Waiting for Tom On Tuesday 19 Nov 2002 2:43 pm, Jason Hihn wrote: > Interesting treatment of Date/Time? +-------+---------------+------+-----+---------+-------+ | Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra | +-------+---------------+------+-----+---------+-------+ | a | int(11) | YES | | NULL | | | b | timestamp(14) | YES | | NULL | | +-------+---------------+------+-----+---------+-------+ 2 rows in set (0.00 sec) mysql> INSERT INTO foo VALUES (1,now()); Query OK, 1 row affected (0.00 sec) mysql> INSERT INTO foo VALUES (2,null); Query OK, 1 row affected (0.01 sec) mysql> INSERT INTO foo VALUES (3,'abcd'); Query OK, 1 row affected (0.00 sec) mysql> INSERT INTO foo VALUES (4,''); Query OK, 1 row affected (0.00 sec) mysql> SELECT * FROM foo; +------+----------------+ | a | b | +------+----------------+ | 1 | 20021120104314 | | 2 | 20021120104326 | | 3 | 00000000000000 | | 4 | 00000000000000 | +------+----------------+ 4 rows in set (0.01 sec) mysql> select version(); +-----------+ | version() | +-----------+ | 3.23.49 | +-----------+ The last case caught me out in real code. The handling of null can't be right, and case 3,4 store an invalid date/time. Not sure if it's been changed in more recent versions, but it was considered a feature. -- Richard Huxton
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: