Re: Server Databases Clash : NO mention of PostgreSQL
| От | Jason Hihn |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Server Databases Clash : NO mention of PostgreSQL |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | NGBBLHANMLKMHPDGJGAPOEBECBAA.jhihn@paytimepayroll.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Server Databases Clash : NO mention of PostgreSQL ? ("Bruno Baguette" <bruno.baguette@netcourrier.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-advocacy |
It's OLD anyway - almost a year. And they obviously were only using Windows to test on, so it couldn't have been a serious test ;-) Just another reason to have native windows support... ahem. ;-) -----Original Message----- From: pgsql-advocacy-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-advocacy-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Bruno Baguette Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 8:50 AM To: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org Subject: [pgsql-advocacy] Server Databases Clash : NO mention of PostgreSQL ? Hello, Does somebody knows why this eWeek article that does a benchmark of theses Databases (DB2 7.2 ,SQL Server, MySQL,Oracle9i and ASE) whithout having added PostgreSQL ? Here's the URL of the article : http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,293,00.asp Thanks in advance ! ------------------------------------------------- Bruno BAGUETTE - bruno.baguette@netcourrier.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: