Re: Linux world Article
От | Jason Hihn |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Linux world Article |
Дата | |
Msg-id | NGBBLHANMLKMHPDGJGAPCELACAAA.jhihn@paytimepayroll.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Linux world Article (Jason Hihn <jhihn@paytimepayroll.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Linux world Article
Re: Linux world Article |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Ok, now that we've all had a chance to read it... Do we know why Apple chose MySQL? Are these statements true? "But when it comes to core SQL capabilities, open-source databases do not support all the features that proprietary enterprise databases such as IBM's DB2 or Oracle's 9i do." "Open-source database providers readily admit that their databases are not yet geared toward powering high-end enterprise systems, such as ERP and CRM applications." I could see that being applied to MySQL, but I thought PostgreSQL was ready! -J -----Original Message----- From: pgsql-advocacy-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-advocacy-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Jason Hihn Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2002 9:13 AM To: Pgsql-Advocacy Subject: [pgsql-advocacy] Linux world Article MySQL and PostgreSQL vs. the commercial offerings. http://linuxworld.com.au/news.php3?nid=2095&tid=1 MySQL gets most of the spotlight, though. >:-( ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: