Re: Postmaster Uptime
От | Tim Knowles |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postmaster Uptime |
Дата | |
Msg-id | NGBBIAKALHHLLCHKLBONIEPHCAAA.tim@ametco.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postmaster Uptime (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postmaster Uptime
Re: Postmaster Uptime |
Список | pgsql-general |
To be honest my reason for requiring an uptime is really just comestic. My company uses a VBA app with PostgreSQL as the backend, an administrator only screen shows database activity (number of backends, running queries - bascially custom versions of some of the pg_stat views), I thought the uptime would be an interesting addition to that. I also think that having easy access to the uptime could help in the advocacy of PostgreSQL. My best is just over 4 months (based on the date given by the ps command), stopped only by an upgrade to 7.2.2! If people are willing to publish/share that sort of info it can only further impress people about PostgreSQL's stability (btw I've never had a crash/problem in the 2 years I've been using PostgreSQL) Best Regards, Tim Knowles Robert Treat <rtreat@webmd.net> writes: > Could we store this as an environment variable that gets set once > postmaster leaves "start up" mode? Whose environment? If the postgres user, how would another user access it? And if only the postgres user could access it, it's not clear to me why that would have any advantages over just storing it in a static C variable. More generally, why is this functionality needed in the first place? Cheers, Neil -- Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: