RE: OK, does anyone have any better ideas?
От | Edmar Wiggers |
---|---|
Тема | RE: OK, does anyone have any better ideas? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | NEBBIAKDCDHFGJMLHCKICEBHCCAA.edmar@brasmap.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: OK, does anyone have any better ideas? (mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>) |
Ответы |
RE: OK, does anyone have any better ideas?
Re: OK, does anyone have any better ideas? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Personally, I'm not too afraid of having an FTS engine outside the database. Oracle's Intermedia, which has a very powerful/fast FTS engine, uses that approach. I could look into how they do the SQL integration, maybe it would yeld some ideas. Mark, about that row identifier: OID's are no good for fast find. Maybe you could use tuple id (TID). But please note that tuple ID's change after a simple update. It's like the offset of the row inside the table file (and therefore blazing fast to get to that row again). One possible idea for SQL integration: can one use index access-method functions to query the FTS outside the database? Yes, it would require some work, but the results I guess it would be wonderful. Ok, Tom, not so fast as an index sitting inside Postgres, but AFAICS that's not going to happen anytime soon. Yours sincerely, Edmar Wiggers BRASMAP Information Systems +55 48 9960 2752
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: