RE: [PORTS] Windows NT binary
От | Jens Skakkebaek |
---|---|
Тема | RE: [PORTS] Windows NT binary |
Дата | |
Msg-id | NDBBLCOBBMBMLKOHDKBACEJACBAA.jskakkebaek@bv2000.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Windows NT binary (Dan Rosner <rosner@scn.org>) |
Список | pgsql-ports |
Dan, I think it would be a great idea. I have spent more than a day to try and compile and I still haven't been able to run it (I get a STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION when running initdb). Having the binaries would make it so much easier for people. Jens -----Original Message----- From: owner-pgsql-ports@postgreSQL.org [mailto:owner-pgsql-ports@postgreSQL.org]On Behalf Of Dan Rosner Sent: Sunday, December 19, 1999 11:38 AM To: pgsql-ports@postgreSQL.org Subject: [PORTS] Windows NT binary Since I'm probably not the last poor soul struggling to build postgresql on NT, I was wondering about the relative pros/cons of distributing the binary. Is there an NT binary available for the current postgres 6.5.3? How much interest would there be in current binaries if they existed? -- Dan Rosner Cascade Programming Group rosner@scn.org ************
В списке pgsql-ports по дате отправления: