RE: pg_dumpall anomaly
От | Tim Mickol |
---|---|
Тема | RE: pg_dumpall anomaly |
Дата | |
Msg-id | NCEEJEAEIDNFKBMALPGMMEFCCDAA.tmickol@combimatrix.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dumpall anomaly (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
no possibility that it was a locally modified script. pg_dumpall came straight out of the 7.1.2-2 PGDG binary rpm -----Original Message----- From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Tom Lane Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 12:11 AM To: tmickol@combimatrix.com Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_dumpall anomaly "Tim Mickol" <tmickol@combimatrix.com> writes: > what are the: <schema_name>|<schema_owner>| directives all about? Good question. They look like an abbreviated select from pg_database, but pg_dumpall shouldn't be doing any such thing. Is it possible you've got a locally modified pg_dumpall script? regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: