RE: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL

To all who are fanning the flames -- this is not the place for prolonged
discussion on operating systems (nor sarcasm and zealous diatribes), is
it? -- please take it offline (please?)

thanks in advance

tjm

"Imensis laboribus comparatur emditio: ac post moriendum est."

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 3:28 PM
To: Trond Eivind Glomsrod
Cc: Alex Knight; Lamar Owen; Vivek Khera; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL


> > Even though it may appear that your server is doing a lot, it's not
facing
> > the load of a highly scaled enterprise level e-commerce site, where
RedHat
> > just doesn't cut it.
>
> That claim is bogus. Red Hat Linux is the number one linux by far in
> enterprise deployments.

And MS has more enterprise deployments than RH.  Does that make MS
better than RH?

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl