Re: Getting oid of 0 when doing LargeObjectManager.create()
От | Chris White |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Getting oid of 0 when doing LargeObjectManager.create() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | NCBBIJCJEKFBDCFKEEEIKEAHHEAA.cjwhite@cisco.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Getting oid of 0 when doing LargeObjectManager.create() (Barry Lind <barry@xythos.com>) |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
I am using jdbc7.2dev-1.2.jar. So I will try the latest development version. I do have auto commit turned off, but don't I have to do a commit once I have written and closed the Large Object in order for it to retained in the database? Also, I thought I needed to store the oid in the database so I could read/delete the Large object later, so how come it becomes invalid on a commit, which I use all the time after doing inserts and updates? Chris -----Original Message----- From: pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Barry Lind Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 8:57 PM To: cjwhite@cisco.com Cc: pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [JDBC] Getting oid of 0 when doing LargeObjectManager.create() Chris, What version are you using? I just fixed a bug last week on this, so have you tried the latest development driver build from jdbc.postgresql.org? If this isn't related to the bug I fixed then it is likely related to the fact that you are trying to use a large object after having done a commit. In order to use large objects you must run with autocommit turned off since the large object pointer becomes invalid on a commit. thanks, --Barry Chris White wrote: > I am getting a oid value of 0 returned when I do a > LargeObjectManager.create(). This tells me that I can't create a large > object. What reasons would cause this? and what I can do to solve the > problems. > > thanks > Chris White ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: