Re: The future of pgAdmin II...
От | Matthew M. |
---|---|
Тема | Re: The future of pgAdmin II... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | NBBBIDFHIPHAPPGCMDBIEELHCNAA.initri@initri.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: The future of pgAdmin II... (Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
Dave, If there's one motto I've learned over the years.. "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." Why move to VB.NET (C#, VB.NET, etc.) in the first place? What new features and performances increases are going to be made available over the VB6 implementation of it ? I spent hundreds of dollars on Visual Studio 6, and have no intention of upgrading to VB.NET, because of cost concerns, and I'm sure there are many other developers that feel the same way. Perhaps in a few years it might really take off, but why lose the prospective developers that might join the project, that don't have VB.NET ? A lot of people have VB6 now, as it is, and know how to use it. You'd possibly be excluding an area of expertise, and developers that can't code in .NET. Again though, why the extra work to convert it, re-test everything, when there is already a working project, that anyone can jump in and modify if they need to ? It just seems like reinventing the wheel, when there is already something that works well. Why spend the extra development time on a new .NET version, when you could be spending that time adding new features and maturing the current version(s) ? My two cents :) Thanks, - Matthew
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: