Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit hashjoins
От | Erik Riedel |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit hashjoins |
Дата | |
Msg-id | MrE1MvW00gNt81tBp8@andrew.cmu.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit hashjoins (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit hashjoins
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from mail: 10-May-99 Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit hashjo.. by Tom Lane@sss.pgh.pa.us > I believe this is fixed, but it'd be nice to have some confirmation from > someone with a platform where long != int ... Erik, have you tried it > recently? > Sorry for the slow response. I tried this when the fix was first done, and I thought I reported to the list that it worked fine. I actually have not updated my tree since then, so I don't know about changes after 25 March. My logs say: 630 snapshot from postgresql CVS (25 March 1999) 631 fix for 64-bit LONGALIGN (works!) I have been using that version since March without problems (well, at least no problems with 64-bit ints and hashjoins...). Erik
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: