Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing)
От | Richard Welty |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Mahogany-0.65.0-13767-20031008-114536.00@averillpark.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing) ("John Wells" <jb@sourceillustrated.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing)
Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 11:28:00 -0400 (EDT) John Wells <jb@sourceillustrated.com> wrote: > It's my opinion that we should be using PG, because of the full ACID > support, and the license involved. A consultant my company hired before > bringing me in is pushing hard for MySql, citing speed and community > support, as well as ACID support. you should also cite conformity to standards. MySQL is significantly different from SQL standards in a number of regards. not that any are fully conformant, but there are spots where MySQL is seriously "out there". richard -- Richard Welty rwelty@averillpark.net Averill Park Networking 518-573-7592 Java, PHP, PostgreSQL, Unix, Linux, IP Network Engineering, Security
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: