Re: performance problems with bulk inserts/updates on tsrange with gist-based exclude constrains
От | Igor Neyman |
---|---|
Тема | Re: performance problems with bulk inserts/updates on tsrange with gist-based exclude constrains |
Дата | |
Msg-id | MWHPR07MB2877649C8B70929DA95FC928DAF30@MWHPR07MB2877.namprd07.prod.outlook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: performance problems with bulk inserts/updates on tsrange with gist-based exclude constrains (Chris Withers <chris@simplistix.co.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: performance problems with bulk inserts/updates on
tsrange with gist-based exclude constrains
|
Список | pgsql-general |
-----Original Message----- From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Chris Withers Sent: Friday, September 16, 2016 6:47 AM To: John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com>; pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [GENERAL] performance problems with bulk inserts/updates on tsrange with gist-based exclude constrains On 16/09/2016 10:26, John R Pierce wrote: > On 9/16/2016 2:23 AM, John R Pierce wrote: >> >> wait, what is a tsrange? the standard textsearch data types in >> postgres are tsvector and tsquery, > > never mind, I should have known, its a timestamp range. ... > > > when you do updates, are you changing any of the indexed fields, or > just "value" ? Yeah, it's a temporal table, so "updates" involve modifying the period column for a row to set its end ts, and then insertinga new row with a start ts running on from that. Of course, the adds are just inserting new rows. cheers, Chris ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ So, what is the value for "end ts", when the record is inserted (the range just started)? Regards, Igor Neyman
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: