RE: Big performance slowdown from 11.2 to 13.3
От | ldh@laurent-hasson.com |
---|---|
Тема | RE: Big performance slowdown from 11.2 to 13.3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | MN2PR15MB2560A2F486FE1ACB520ECCBD85E49@MN2PR15MB2560.namprd15.prod.outlook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Big performance slowdown from 11.2 to 13.3 (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>) |
Ответы |
Re: Big performance slowdown from 11.2 to 13.3
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
-----Original Message----- From: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2021 13:36 To: ldh@laurent-hasson.com Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>; Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>; David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>; pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Big performance slowdown from 11.2 to 13.3 On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 10:33 AM ldh@laurent-hasson.com <ldh@laurent-hasson.com> wrote: > Damn... I know Windows is a lower priority, and this is yet another issue, but in Healthcare, Windows is so prevalent everywhere... To be clear, I didn't actually say that. I said that it doesn't matter either way, as far as addressing this long standing"int64 vs long" issue goes. -- Peter Geoghegan Yes, agreed Peter... The "lower priority" issue was mentioned, but not in terms of the applicability of the fix overall.Personally, I would prefer going the size_t route vs int/long/int64 in C/C++/. Of course, as a user, I'd love a patchon V13 and something cleaner in V14. Thanks, Laurent.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: