Re: Typo about subxip in comments
От | Japin Li |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Typo about subxip in comments |
Дата | |
Msg-id | MEYP282MB166994010FABEFF20823BF76B6029@MEYP282MB1669.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Typo about subxip in comments (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Typo about subxip in comments
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 12 Nov 2022 at 12:12, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 2:45 PM Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com> wrote: >> Maybe a wrong plural in XidInMvccSnapshot(). >> >> * Make a quick range check to eliminate most XIDs without looking at the >> * xip arrays. >> >> I think we should use "xip array" instead of "xip arrays". >> > > I think here the comment is referring to both xip and subxip array, so > it looks okay to me. > Yeah, it means xip in normal case, and subxip in recovery case. >> Furthermore, if the snapshot is taken during recovery, the xip array is >> empty, and we should check subxip array. How about changing "xip arrays" >> to "xip or subxip array"? >> > > I don't know if that is an improvement. I think we should stick to > your initial proposed change. Agreed. Let's focus on the initial proposed change. -- Regrads, Japin Li. ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co.,Ltd.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: