Re: Draft #5 -- radically re-written
От | Heather Carle |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Draft #5 -- radically re-written |
Дата | |
Msg-id | MBEEJALGFGMJMMOPAONGAEJKFIAA.hcarle@afilias.info обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Draft #5 -- radically re-written (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Josh - just use the city/market you are going to release it in. i.e.: if you are releasing to Toronto papers put in "TORONTO, CANADA," but if you are releasing to West coast media you could put in "LOS ANGELES, CA." The idea behind this is really to raise the eyebrow of "local" media. I would then just pick the most relevant media market and include that city/state on the release you will post to the Web site. In reality though, the focus of reporters at tech trade magazines are usually national (or international) and so the dateline generally only serves as a point of reference so they know where the company is located and thus becomes less important from a news filtering perspective. Hope that helps. Heather -----Original Message----- From: Josh Berkus [mailto:josh@agliodbs.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 8:17 PM To: hcarle@afilias.info Cc: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Draft #5 -- radically re-written Heather, > INSERT CITY/STATE - August xx, 2003 - Can you give me a suggestion about this for the 7.4 release? PostgreSQL isn't located anywhere in particular. But if we omit the city and state, some news agencies will fill in TORONTO, CANADA on their own, furthering the confusion between us and PostgreSQL Inc. Using "THE INTERNET" seems pretentious. Any ideas? -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: