FW: oracle ate
От | elein |
---|---|
Тема | FW: oracle ate |
Дата | |
Msg-id | MABBJCMLMNABIPABODDHAEENCAAA.elein@nextbus.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: FW: oracle ate
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hmm, no response on pgsql-general. Anyone up on oracle's implementation? elein ================== Elein Mustain elein@nextbus.com (510)420-3120 -----Original Message----- From: elein [mailto:elein@nextbus.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 6:41 PM To: pgsql-general@hub.org Cc: elein Subject: oracle ate Does anyone have a writeup or deconstruction of the implementation of Oracle's extensibility capabilities? I am a long time ordbms proponent (illustra, informix and now postgresql). And I have heard mixed information regarding Oracle's extensibility. Do they use a unified type system? Are cartriges separate processes? Do the separate processes (if they are) share memory with the server process or is all the communication through pipish things. If I don't use their standard cartridges (image, text, video) how easy is it to write my own. Any GIS specific pro or con info w/Oracle? Am I asking the right questions? I would like to put the questions to rest and get on with it. Feel free to point me to the right audience or source if this is not a good question for this group. thanks elein@nextbus.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: