Re: rename() vs. link(); building from source
От | David P. Caldwell |
---|---|
Тема | Re: rename() vs. link(); building from source |
Дата | |
Msg-id | JIEPJODHFFPGJDGMCPBEMEMEDIAA.inonit@inonit.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: rename() vs. link(); building from source (Jason Tishler <jason@tishler.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: rename() vs. link(); building from source
|
Список | pgsql-cygwin |
Jason: Unfortunately, I hit send just minutes before receiving your e-mail. Maybe we should revise the patch to reflect the current source tree? I'm not at all familiar with protocol in this case, but if you want me to do something, let me know. Of course, I suppose I should confirm that my install is working first ... :) -- David. -----Original Message----- From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason@tishler.net] Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2002 10:18 AM To: Barry Pederson Cc: David P. Caldwell; pgsql-cygwin@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [CYGWIN] rename() vs. link(); building from source Barry, [snip] Did you use the (exact) patch at the end of: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-cygwin/2002-04/msg00057.php If so, then please confirm this fact and I will submit this patch to pgsql-patches for consideration. If not, then please try again with this (exact) patch. If you are still successful, then I will submit it. I need this assistance, because I cannot (easily) reproduce this problem myself. Thanks, Jason
В списке pgsql-cygwin по дате отправления: