Re: SERIAL Field
От | Joel Burton |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SERIAL Field |
Дата | |
Msg-id | JGEPJNMCKODMDHGOBKDNOEPLCMAA.joel@joelburton.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SERIAL Field ("Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: SERIAL Field
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Langille [mailto:dan@langille.org] > Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 12:41 PM > To: Joel Burton > Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [ADMIN] SERIAL Field > > > In any event, inserting then using currval() is the standard practice > > around here, and it works great. Nothing fishy at all here, > nothing to see, > > move on. > > Why is that "less risk"? It's not; nextval() is just fine. I was half asleep and thinking, I think, of another database when I wrote that. "You say nextval() + write, I say write + currval()..." J. Joel BURTON | joel@joelburton.com | joelburton.com | aim: wjoelburton Knowledge Management & Technology Consultant
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: