Re: JDBC 3.0
От | Joe Shevland |
---|---|
Тема | Re: JDBC 3.0 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | HEECIHEEJDBMCCGMGIOBMEIGCHAA.jshevland@j-elite.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: JDBC 3.0 (Dave Cramer <Dave@micro-automation.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: JDBC 3.0
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Here's a link: http://www.j-elite.com/pgsql/tmp/jdbc3.tgz Its about ~22k compressed. It could be a little ugly though: its the output of the diff command run from WinCVS, so I'm notsure if its that clean. If there are space/tab probs etc I'll make the changes on the bsd box lurking under the tableand get a better diff. Also, this can't be applied on top of everything and just work, I'm fairly sure the methods added to xa.ClientConnectionwill break earlier jdbc builds. I didn't check whether the xa package was built conditionally, maybe wecould swap in the appropriate class in a similar way to Driver.java.in. I also changed the 'test' target to 'test-jdbc2',and haven't added any tests yet. Joe > -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Dave Cramer > Sent: Thursday, 2 May 2002 12:31 > To: Joe Shevland > Cc: pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [JDBC] JDBC 3.0 > > > Joe, > > Can you send the context diff to the list? > > Dave > On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 22:09, Joe Shevland wrote: > > I've built a JDBC 3 driver from the current CVS sources (added > a org.postgresql.jdbc3 package and some changes to build.xml). > Its mainly just placeholder methods. I think someone else might > have submitted a patch for this though, but I can put up a link > for a context diff. Otherwise, the additions to the PGBlob and > PGClob classes for JDBC 3.0 might be worthwhile.
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: