Re: SCSI vs SATA
От | James Mansion |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SCSI vs SATA |
Дата | |
Msg-id | HCEPKPMCAJLDGJIBCLGHMEMGHGAA.james@mansionfamily.plus.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SCSI vs SATA (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: SCSI vs SATA
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
>Right --- the point is not the interface, but whether the drive is built >for reliability or to hit a low price point. Personally I take the marketing mublings about the enterprise drives with a pinch of salt. The low-price drives HAVE TO be reliable too, because a non-negligible failure rate will result in returns processing costs that destroy a very thin margin. Granted, there was a move to very short warranties a while back, but the trend has been for more realistic warranties again recently. You can bet they don't do this unless the drives are generally pretty good. James -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.25/745 - Release Date: 03/04/2007 12:48
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: