Re: Wrong results with postgres_fdw and merge anti join from RHEL 7.9 to RHEL 8.7
От | Daniel Westermann (DWE) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Wrong results with postgres_fdw and merge anti join from RHEL 7.9 to RHEL 8.7 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | GV0P278MB041930B2E5FE2DFEC77FE36FD2909@GV0P278MB0419.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Wrong results with postgres_fdw and merge anti join from RHEL 7.9 to RHEL 8.7 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Wrong results with postgres_fdw and merge anti join from RHEL 7.9 to RHEL 8.7
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
>Yeah, doesn't look like you've made any configuration mistakes.
>So either the two OSes sort differently, or there's index corruption
>causing the indexscan to give bogus output.
>causing the indexscan to give bogus output.
We did a rebuild of the indexes and also vacuum full, just to be sure. Did not change anything.
>The sample data you showed seemed to only involve numeric-ish strings,
>which would be highly unlikely to change sort order across locale
>updates. But maybe there are weirder entries elsewhere in the column?
I can probably provide a dump, but I've to ask. Would that help?
>Anyway, the first thing I'd try is reindexing both tables --- doesn't
>look like they're large enough to make that painful. If that doesn't
>fix it you must have a collation difference. (Asking both systems
>for a sorted dump of their cprd columns could help confirm that.)
>You could probably hack around that, if an OS update isn't feasible,
>by labelling the foreign table's column with some collation you aren't
>using anywhere else in the local database.
I'll try do that tomorrow.
Thanks
Daniel
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: