Re: [SQL] Transient Disk Usage Higher In 7.2 ?
От | Christopher Kings-Lynne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [SQL] Transient Disk Usage Higher In 7.2 ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOOEHGCBAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [SQL] Transient Disk Usage Higher In 7.2 ?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Reposted to -hackers. Are you able to post the actual SQL query they are trying to execute? If not the exact one with the exact data, an analagous one? Chris > -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-sql-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgsql-sql-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Mark kirkwood > Sent: Tuesday, 19 February 2002 4:38 PM > To: pgsql-sql > Subject: [SQL] Transient Disk Usage Higher In 7.2 ? > > > Dear list, > > I have a customer who is testing 7.2 before upgrading (from 7.1.3) > > They are getting errors like : > > cannot extend tablename - No space left on device check free disk space > or > write to hashjoin temp file failed > > However when they attempt the same query with a 7.1.3 installation (On > the same machine), they do not get these. > (I dont know how different the query plans are between the 7.1 and 7.2 > tests... see below) > > I am informed that there is "quite a bit" of free disk on the > machine.(no numbers I am afraid... I am going in to have a look on > Thursday). > > Is there an "expectation" that 7.2 will use temp space more aggressively > than 7.1 ? > > (They are using a vanilla Mandrake Linux - either 8.0 or 8.1...) > > regards and apologies about the lack of specifics :-(.... > > Mark > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: