pg_stat_reset() weirdness
| От | Christopher Kings-Lynne |
|---|---|
| Тема | pg_stat_reset() weirdness |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOMEJNCDAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_stat_reset() weirdness
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi guys, If you apply the pg_stat_reset() function patch you get this regression failure. Is this because it's returning a bool I guess? Shall I just fix the regression test to exclude this function? Chris *** ./expected/opr_sanity.out Fri Jul 19 07:11:32 2002 --- ./results/opr_sanity.out Fri Aug 9 13:26:00 2002 *************** *** 27,34 **** AND p1.proname !~ 'costestimate$' AND p1.proname != 'update_pg_pwd_and_pg_group'; oid | proname ! -----+--------- ! (0 rows) -- Look for conflicting proc definitions (same names and input datatypes). -- (This test should be dead code now that wehave the unique index --- 27,35 ---- AND p1.proname !~ 'costestimate$' AND p1.proname != 'update_pg_pwd_and_pg_group'; oid | proname ! ------+--------------- ! 2249 | pg_stat_reset ! (1 row) -- Look for conflicting proc definitions (same names and input datatypes). -- (This test should be dead code now that wehave the unique index ======================================================================
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: