Re: Another quick question...
От | Christopher Kings-Lynne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Another quick question... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOIEHHCDAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Another quick question... (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Another quick question...
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes: > > If you have RelationGetRelationName(rel) to get the name of a > relation, how > > do you get it's fully qualified schema name? Or how do I get the schema > > name for the relation? > > Well, you can do get_namespace_name(rel->rd_rel->relnamespace), but > I don't really agree with changing error messages to *always* quote > the schema name. I think that'd be overly verbose. An appropriate > solution is to mention the schema name only when it's necessary to > identify the relation (ie, the rel would not be found in your current > search path). The problem I see is that imagine you're browsing your logs. If you see an error message (or a notice) that refers just to a table, you have no idea which schema the table is in... Chris
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: