pg_stat_reset round 3
От | Christopher Kings-Lynne |
---|---|
Тема | pg_stat_reset round 3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOGEIDCDAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_stat_reset round 2 ("Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_stat_reset round 3
Re: pg_stat_reset round 3 Re: pg_stat_reset round 3 |
Список | pgsql-patches |
OK, I've attached a new patch where the function is marked volatile. I tested and you cannot have the function returning void, so I left it returning boolean. Chris > -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-patches-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgsql-patches-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Christopher > Kings-Lynne > Sent: Monday, 5 August 2002 4:00 PM > To: Neil Conway > Cc: Patches > Subject: Re: [PATCHES] pg_stat_reset round 2 > > > > It should be marked volatile (rather than stable), as it has > > side-effects. > > OK, I'll fix it. > > > Wouldn't PG_RETURN_VOID() be more appropriate than returning true? > > I was under the impression that functions used in SELECTs cannot use > PG_RETURN_VOID()... > > Chris > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html >
Вложения
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: