> The syntax is largely SQL92 compliant, but not totally. I'm not sure how
> the SQL spec expects parameters to be set up in PREPARE, but I doubt
> it's the same way I used. And the SQL92 spec for EXECUTE is functionally
> similar, but uses a different syntax (EXECUTE ... USING INTO <rel>, I
> think). If someone can decipher the spec on these two points and
> can suggest what the proper syntax should be, let me know.
I'll have a read of the spec for you to see if I can decode something out of
it! I think it's pretty essential we have full standard compliance on this
one!
Chris