Re: Proposed GUC Variable
От | Christopher Kings-Lynne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposed GUC Variable |
Дата | |
Msg-id | GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOAENNCDAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposed GUC Variable (Markus Bertheau <twanger@bluetwanger.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposed GUC Variable
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
So long as the change is only evident in the log, I agree. Chris > -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Markus Bertheau > Sent: Friday, 23 August 2002 3:55 PM > To: Bruce Momjian > Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne; Hackers > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposed GUC Variable > > > On Fri, 2002-08-23 at 04:46, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > * Add GUC parameter to print queries that generate errors > > Maybe don't make that an option, but rather do it always. I don't see > where that would hurt. And killing configuration options that are > unneeded is always a Good Thing. > > -- > Markus Bertheau. > Berlin, Berlin. > Germany. > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: