Re: How about a psql backslash command to show GUCs?
От | Mark Dilger |
---|---|
Тема | Re: How about a psql backslash command to show GUCs? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | FF230C05-B27A-4C7B-8514-A5A21EA3D7CC@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: How about a psql backslash command to show GUCs? (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: How about a psql backslash command to show GUCs?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On Apr 7, 2022, at 6:21 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote: > > \dconf seems fine to me We have too many synonyms for configuration parameters. "config", "guc", "parameter", and "setting" are already in use. I thought we agreed on the other thread that "setting" means the value, and "parameter" is the thing being set. It'strue that "config" refers to parameters in the name of pg_catalog.set_config, which is a pretty strong precedent, butsadly "config" also refers to configuration files, the build configuration (as in the "pg_config" tool), text search configuration,etc. While grep'ing through doc/src/sgml, I see no instances of "conf" ever referring to configuration parameters. It only everrefers to configuration files. I'd prefer not adding it to the list of synonyms. — Mark Dilger EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: