Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD
От | Scott Carey |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD |
Дата | |
Msg-id | FEDD0586-54B5-4F42-94AF-ACB3D89075E8@richrelevance.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD (Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD
vs desktop HDD
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Aug 11, 2010, at 9:30 PM, Greg Smith wrote: > Scott Carey wrote: >> What is the likelihood that your RAID card fails, or that the battery that reported 'good health' only lasts 5 minutesand you lose data before power is restored? What is the likelihood of human error? >> > > These are all things that happen sometimes, sure. The problem with the > cheap SSDs is that they happen downright often if you actually test for > it. If someone is aware of the risk and makes an informed decision, > fine. But most of the time I see articles like the one that started > this thread that are oblivious to the issue, and that's really bad. > Agreed. There is a HUGE gap between "ooh ssd's are fast, look!" and engineering a solution that uses them properly withall their strengths and faults. And as 'gnuoytr' points out, there is a big difference between an Intel SSD and say,this thing: http://www.nimbusdata.com/products/s-class_overview.html > -- > Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US Baltimore, MD > PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support > greg@2ndQuadrant.com www.2ndQuadrant.us >
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: