Re: Can't edit tables with timestamps
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Can't edit tables with timestamps |
Дата | |
Msg-id | FED2B709E3270E4B903EB0175A49BCB129332E@dogbert.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Can't edit tables with timestamps ("Thomas Sandford" <thomas@paradisegreen.co.uk>) |
Список | pgadmin-support |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Sandford [mailto:thomas@paradisegreen.co.uk] > Sent: 28 March 2002 12:11 > To: Dave Page > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-support] Can't edit tables with timestamps > > > [ ... problems editing tables containing timestamps ... ] > > > Thought (which may have occured to you and/or be impractical, but > > > I'll mention it anyway) - if the table contains a primary > key (as in > > > this case) could you build the update where clause from > that alone? > > > Would fix at least some (and quite likely > > > most) instances of this type of problem. > > > > That should fix *all* problems such as this. In fact, all > we need is a > > Unique column. The problem is that the ISUNIQUE property of > each field > > object in the recordset is null at the moment. I'll look > into it some > more. > > The exceptions I was thinking of were: > > 1) Where the table doesn't have a primary key defined (or > with your wider strategy any unique fields) In my reply above I was making the assumption that it would, if not we'd fall back to the current method. > 2) where that primary key (/unique field) is itself a timestamp. Yes, this would be a problem. It's a fairly unlikely scenario though I'd have thought. I can't think of any application where this would be a good idea offhand. > It would appear (from viewing the individual columns of a table within > pgadmin) that pgadmin _can_ detect which column(s) is(/are) a > primary key for a table (and of course, in database terms, > the "right" way to specify a record from a table is in terms > of the primary key value for that record). Yes, we can detect it, but the mechanism used by pgAdmin for viewing the schema is totally seperate from the data recordset. What I need to do is not rely on the Recordset object, but go and query pgSchema to find suitable columns. This may slow down the first edit of a table significantly though, if that part of the object hierarchy hasn't been built, or caches haven't been populated yet. That's not normally a problem, but I'd have to figure out the best place for the queries to be made to give the best illusion of speed. Regards, Dave.
В списке pgadmin-support по дате отправления: