Re: Speedup twophase transactions
От | Stas Kelvich |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Speedup twophase transactions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | FE5001FE-BD39-44DB-AE62-C33ACAFC57B7@postgrespro.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Speedup twophase transactions (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Speedup twophase transactions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On 07 Sep 2016, at 03:09, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> On 06 Sep 2016, at 12:03, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Stas Kelvich <s.kelvich@postgrespro.ru> wrote: >>>> Oh, I was preparing new version of patch, after fresh look on it. Probably, I should >>>> said that in this topic. I’ve found a bug in sub transaction handling and now working >>>> on fix. >>> >>> What's the problem actually? >> >> Handling of xids_p array in PrescanPreparedTransactions() is wrong for prepared tx's in memory. >> Also I want to double-check and add comments to RecoveryInProgress() checks in FinishGXact. >> >> I’ll post reworked patch in several days. > > Could you use as a base the version I just sent yesterday then? I > noticed many mistakes in the comments, for example many s/it's/its/ > and did a couple of adjustments around the code, the goto next_file > was particularly ugly. That will be that much work not do to again > later. Yes. Already merged branch with your version. -- Stas Kelvich Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com Russian Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: