Re: Eliminating SPI from RI triggers - take 2

> On 21 Mar 2023, at 06:03, Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 3:54 AM Gregory Stark (as CFM) <stark.cfm@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 17 Oct 2022 at 14:59, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:

>>> But I think the bigger problem for this patch set is that the
>>> design-level feedback from
>>>
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BTgmoaiTNj4DgQy42OT9JmTTP1NWcMV%2Bke0i%3D%2Ba7%3DVgnzqGXw%40mail.gmail.com
>>> hasn't really been addressed, AFAICS. ri_LookupKeyInPkRelPlanIsValid
>>> is still trivial in v7, and that still seems wrong to me. And I still
>>> don't know how we're going to avoid changing the semantics in ways
>>> that are undesirable, or even knowing precisely what we did change. If
>>> we don't have answers to those questions, then I suspect that this
>>> patch set isn't going anywhere.
>>
>> Amit, do you plan to work on this patch for this commitfest (and
>> therefore this release?). And do you think it has a realistic chance
>> of being ready for commit this month?
>
> Unfortunately, I don't think so.

This thread has stalled with the patch not building and/or applying for a
while, so I am going to mark this Returned with Feebdback.  Please feel free to
resubmit to a future CF when there is renewed interest/time to work on this.

--
Daniel Gustafsson