Re: UTF-8 and LIKE vs =
От | David Wheeler |
---|---|
Тема | Re: UTF-8 and LIKE vs = |
Дата | |
Msg-id | FBD650D1-FAE2-11D8-A2D5-000393D9369E@kineticode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: UTF-8 and LIKE vs = (Joel <rees@ddcom.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: UTF-8 and LIKE vs =
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Aug 27, 2004, at 5:27 AM, Joel wrote: > I would expect to run into problems with collation. In that case, you > may end up setting up separate databases for each language, as I > mentioned before in the mail that I forgot to post to the list so > people > could correct me if I'm wrong. As far as I know, collation is essentially how an index is ordered, correct? So that when I so an "ORDER BY" query, the order in which the rows are returned is determined by the collation. Is that correct? If so, then I'm happy with the 80% solution of defaulting to Unicode ordering (or "Unicodabetical"). > Other than that, it depends on what functions the database will have. > > If what is being done with the CJKT is pretty basic stuff, I may be > just > another too-pessimistic voice. Frankly, I'm more concerned with the ability of queries to work than I am of ordering results. Ordering is strictly secondary. Regards, David
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: