Re: Synchronize with imath upstream
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Synchronize with imath upstream |
Дата | |
Msg-id | FB934CD7-B508-4523-B920-F0EE9CCB1756@anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Synchronize with imath upstream (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Synchronize with imath upstream
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On February 6, 2019 5:17:50 AM GMT+05:30, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >On 2019-Feb-03, David Fetter wrote: > >> On Sun, Feb 03, 2019 at 07:07:36AM +0000, Andrew Gierth wrote: >> > >>>>> "Noah" == Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> writes: > >> > So far, expressed opinions have run about 4:2 in favour of allowing >> > mixed declarations and code. >> >> +1 for this. > >Just curious, why do you care? If you want to use such constructs in >extension code, you can add it in your makefiles. > >I'm -1 for this myself. I think there are a few places that could >benefit from it, but my fear is that many *more* places would get >worse. Because of imported code like ryu and imath? And because it can make code considerably better when used judiciously. Andres -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: