Re: CoC [Final v2]
От | Christophe Pettus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CoC [Final v2] |
Дата | |
Msg-id | FB6D8197-FC54-4F18-8A7D-E0E84456788C@thebuild.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CoC [Final v2] ("David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: CoC [Final v2]
Re: CoC [Final v2] |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Jan 24, 2016, at 2:48 PM, "David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com> wrote: > I think that’s planned for a separate document, to be linked. I think those need to put in place at the same time. It's very hard to judge how good or bad a CoC is absent a reportingmechanism. I'd respectfully suggest that we table the discussion of the CoC text at this point, let the high passions moderate a bit,and talk about the process. That is the detail in which the devils will live. -- -- Christophe Pettus xof@thebuild.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: