Re: role self-revocation
От | Mark Dilger |
---|---|
Тема | Re: role self-revocation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | F9EB1DD2-5739-4954-AC16-372E289A55DD@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: role self-revocation (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: role self-revocation
Re: role self-revocation |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On Mar 7, 2022, at 12:01 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > > It's been pointed out upthread that this would have undesirable > security implications, because the admin option would be inherited, > and the implicit permission isn't. Right, but with a reflexive self-admin-option, we could document that it works in a non-inherited way. We'd just be sayingthe current hard-coded behavior is an option which can be revoked rather than something you're stuck with. — Mark Dilger EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: