Re: SQLJSON
От | Steven Schlansker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SQLJSON |
Дата | |
Msg-id | F9AA993B-8CF6-4DFE-B582-BD775DCC1583@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | SQLJSON (Dave Cramer <davecramer@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: SQLJSON
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On Jun 26, 2015, at 7:57 AM, Dave Cramer <davecramer@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm looking for comments on how to implement a SQLJSON type in JDBC. > > As there is no getSQLJSON in the resultset interface this could only be used in getObject. > > Notionally it would model itself after SQLXML. https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/index.html?java/sql/SQLXML.html I used JSON extensively in one of my projects, but have never used SQLXML. I'm having trouble understanding why the SQLXMLinterface adds any value to passing rs.getBinaryStream to your favorite JSON parser. Especially since you would haveto use getObject, I am not seeing how: rs.getObject("field", SQLJSON.class).mapToType(MyType.class) is simpler than: jacksonObjectMapper.readValue(rs.getBinaryStream("field"), MyType.class) which already works today as far as I understand. Doubly so since nobody will agree on which JSON parsing library to use. I'm sure I'm missing something?
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: