Re: BUG #15299: relation does not exist errors
От | Jeff Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #15299: relation does not exist errors |
Дата | |
Msg-id | F8F8913D-3491-471A-A9D6-4C36CE9F786D@pgexperts.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #15299: relation does not exist errors (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #15299: relation does not exist errors
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
> On Jul 26, 2018, at 9:50 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > =?utf-8?q?PG_Bug_reporting_form?= <noreply@postgresql.org> writes: >> We recently upgraded some production servers to 9.5.13 on Saturday >> (7/21/2018) and they ran fine for 2 days. On Wednesday morning, we started >> seeing some strange issues where postgres was reporting tons of "relation" >> does not exist errors. Here are some snippets from the logs: > >> 2018-07-25 14:33:53.243 >> GMT,"app_db","webapp",34887,"127.0.0.1:56740",5b587d3b.8847,90363,"PARSE",2018-07-25 >> 13:38:03 GMT,287/3021104,0,ERROR,42P01,"relation ""login_informations"" does >> not exist",,, >> ,,,"SELECT ""login_informations"".* FROM ""login_informations"" WHERE >> ""login_informations"".""id"" = 735211 LIMIT 1",37,,"sidekiq 4.1.2 procore >> [0 of 5 busy]" > >> Connecting to the DB via psql and issuing a \d login_informations showed >> that the table was there. Running one of the queries from the logs by hand >> worked fine. > > My first thought would be something to do with a restrictive search_path. Good thought. As far as I can tell we never change it from the default and everything in that DB is in the public schema.
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: