Re: IN clause
От | Brandon Aiken |
---|---|
Тема | Re: IN clause |
Дата | |
Msg-id | F8E84F0F56445B4CB39E019EF67DACBA3C4BFA@exchsrvr.winemantech.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: IN clause (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: IN clause
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Hasn't it been said enough? Don't allow NULLs in your database. Databases are for storing data, not a lack of it. The only time NULL should appear is during outer joins. -- Brandon Aiken CS/IT Systems Engineer -----Original Message----- From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Martijn van Oosterhout Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 7:20 AM To: surabhi.ahuja Cc: A. Kretschmer; pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [GENERAL] IN clause On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 05:31:07PM +0530, surabhi.ahuja wrote: > That is fine > but what I was actually expecting is this > if > select * from table where col_name in (null, 'a', 'b'); > > to return those rows where col_name is null or if it = a or if it is = b > > But i think in does not not support null queries , am i right? You'll need to check the standard, but IN() treats NULL specially, I think it returns NULL if any of the elements is null, or something like that. It certainly doesn't work the way you think it does. Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: