Re: Multi-language to be or not to be

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



- --On Sunday, February 11, 2007 16:33:21 -0800 "Joshua D. Drake" 
<jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:

> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>>> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>>>> The reality is this, the majority (likely > 98%) is English
>>>>> speaking.
>>>> of what?
>>> The postgresql community.
>>
>> And that statistic is derived from what sources?
>
> *sigh*, I am not going to argue the obvious with you. If you don't
> agree, don't agree.

I personally don't agree either ... I would guess that the majority of 
PostgreSQL users are non-English as *first* language ... just because they can 
communicate in English doesn't mean that their are either fluent in, or 
comfortable with, the language ...

I'd love to see our demographics some day, but would guess that the Japanese 
themselves are a fairly high percentage of users, based on how they've 
organized over there ... Spanish is probably another high percentage language 
... French, German, Chinese (Mandarin?), Arabic ... if you look at 'first 
languages', I suspect that "English" is alot smaller then 98% ... whether its 
less then 50%, that I wouldn't hazard a guess ...

Personally, I think it almost does us a dis-service statistically not to have 
more translations available on our main web site ...

- ----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org                              MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy               Skype: hub.org        ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFFz9+x4QvfyHIvDvMRAuyXAJ9t5Y6bcwaOuw+HCFVstOLSsuL4VACgi9iP
azNDNscxt7jNIpmJID1a8g8=
=P6cB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----