Re: CoC [Final v2]
От | Christophe Pettus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CoC [Final v2] |
Дата | |
Msg-id | F7CEACC6-7B10-4AB5-A3E7-9F0725E03B63@thebuild.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | CoC [Final v2] ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: CoC [Final v2]
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Jan 24, 2016, at 5:35 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: > You are wrong and the fact that we have gone from a motion style, to a story style, to a continually and incrementallyimproving draft proves it. This is the largest feature the community has tried to design and implement. It isgoing to take a little time. "The document has changed" is not a consensus emerging. A significant portion of the participants don't want a CoC at all,and they are feeling ignored. A significant portion of the participants don't want this CoC, because they feel it'snot strong enough, and they're feeling ignored. Those two parties are not trivial; in fact, they make up most of thepeople who are commenting right now. > This shouldn't cause any rifts. And, yet, it is. > If you don't want to constructively participate in the development of this feature, nobody is asking you to. Participation does not need to be limited to copy-editing. Of all the ways to develop a community CoC, we're engaged injust about the worst possible one right now. -- -- Christophe Pettus xof@thebuild.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: