Re: new heapcheck contrib module

Hi,

On October 26, 2020 7:13:15 AM PDT, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 9:56 AM Mark Dilger
>> <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>>> hornet is still unhappy even after
>>>> 321633e17b07968e68ca5341429e2c8bbf15c331?
>
>>> That appears to be a failed test for pg_surgery rather than for
>amcheck.  Or am I reading the log wrong?
>
>> Oh, yeah, you're right. I don't know why it just failed now, though:
>> there are a bunch of successful runs preceding it. But I guess it's
>> unrelated to this thread.
>
>pg_surgery's been unstable since it went in.  I believe Andres is
>working on a fix.

I posted one a while ago - was planning to push a cleaned up version soon if nobody comments in the near future.

Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.