Re: CREATE ROLE IF NOT EXISTS
От | Mark Dilger |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CREATE ROLE IF NOT EXISTS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | F57B443F-68E0-414E-BDC1-5A37D03A7F99@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CREATE ROLE IF NOT EXISTS (David Christensen <david.christensen@crunchydata.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: CREATE ROLE IF NOT EXISTS
Re: CREATE ROLE IF NOT EXISTS |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On Nov 9, 2021, at 7:36 AM, David Christensen <david.christensen@crunchydata.com> wrote: > > If CINE semantics are at issue, what about the CREATE OR REPLACE semantics with some sort of merge into the existing role? I don't care strongly about which approach is taken, just think the overall "make this role exist in this form" withoutan error is useful in my own work, and CINE was easier to implement as a first pass. CREATE OR REPLACE might be a better option, not with the "merge into the existing role" part, but rather as drop+create. If a malicious actor has already added other roles to the role, or created a table with a malicious triggerdefinition, the drop part will fail, which is good from a security viewpoint. Of course, the drop portion will alsofail under other conditions which don't entail any security concerns, but maybe they could be addressed in a series offollow-on patches? I understand this idea is not as useful for creating idempotent scripts, but maybe it gets you part of the way there? — Mark Dilger EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: