Re: The case for preserving case.

On Apr 24, 2004, at 00:48, Tom Lane wrote:
> You do realize that any such patch would be at least a thousand times
> larger than that?

I am coming from a state of ignorance past the fact that commenting out 
four lines of code appeared to create the behaviour I desired. I knew 
that just changing it to match the behaviour *I* wanted isn't the same 
thing as making a change that could work for everyone; that's why I 
asked what sort of implementation of this behaviour would be 
acceptable.

>  And have vast repercussions on existing client code?

I don't want to impose this on anyone else, I just want a postgresql 
that doesn't mangle my case, as case carries meaning in my application. From what I've seen online, other people
migratingaway from MySQL 
 
would like this behaviour to be an option as well.

> I'm willing to debate this, but not with people who claim it's a
> four-line change.  Do some research.

You are welcome to not pay attention to what I have to say; I will 
probably never be deeply involved in the PostgreSQL codebase.

I am willing to do more work to make this option that is very useful to 
me more widely acceptable.
--
Living on earth and in space are the same class of
problem. In one, the environment is harshly inimical to
humans: in the other, the inverse is true.
~mindlace                            http://mindlace.net