Re: Max connections
От | Benjamin Krajmalnik |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Max connections |
Дата | |
Msg-id | F4E6A2751A2823418A21D4A160B689883FCD91@fletch.stackdump.local обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Max connections (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
Tom, This exercise is exactly to help us size our production server, but I appreciate what you are saying. I am using pgbouncer, but my understanding is that I need to make as many potential connections available on the server side as the maximum pool size - I will shoot them an email to get some guidance. As always, thank you so much for your assistance. > -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us] > Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 7:54 AM > To: Benjamin Krajmalnik > Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Max connections > > "Benjamin Krajmalnik" <kraj@illumen.com> writes: > > I am setting up a test environment to simulate a very high load. We > > have a server farm which is receiving data (cold be thousands of > > simultaneous users posting data). I currently have max_connections > set > > to 500 and the server is starting ok. If I try to increase the > > max_connections to 1000, the server is unable to start. I am running > a > > VM with 4GB RAM. Swap space is not being used, and the system is > > showing about 1.5GB of ram not being utilized. > > Quite honestly, you're living in fantasy land if you expect to support > 1000 concurrently active backends on such a restricted server. Get > yourself a connection pooler and knock down max_connections to 100 or > so. > > regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: