Re: Real vs Int performance
От | Igor Neyman |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Real vs Int performance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | F4C27E77F7A33E4CA98C19A9DC6722A2070C23A0@EXCHANGE.corp.perceptron.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Real vs Int performance (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us] > Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 5:12 PM > To: David Greco > Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: Real vs Int performance > > David Greco <David_Greco@harte-hanks.com> writes: > > Came across a problem I find perplexing. I recreated the > dimensional > > tables in Oracle and the fields that are integers in Oracle became > > integers in Postgres. Was experiencing terrible performance > during the > > load and narrowed down to a particular dimensional lookup > problem. > ....................................... > ....................................... > ....................................... > ....................................... > In real life, this query is actually bound and parameterized, > > In that case, an EXPLAIN using literal constants is next door > to useless in terms of telling you what will happen in real > life. You need to pay attention to exactly how the > parameterization is done. Again, I'm suspecting a wrong > datatype indication. > > regards, tom lane > To see what happens with parametrized query in "real life" you could try "auto_explain" contrib module. Regards, Igor Neyman
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: