Re: Please Recommend a Front End App
От | Sean Davis |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Please Recommend a Front End App |
Дата | |
Msg-id | F2A59C55-C357-11D9-9250-000393CFE1C4@mail.nih.gov обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Please Recommend a Front End App (John DeSoi <desoi@pgedit.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On May 12, 2005, at 7:44 PM, John DeSoi wrote: > > On May 12, 2005, at 7:06 PM, Kurt Gibson wrote: > >> One important solution I created in Filemaker Pro requires very >> detailed and exact replication of official court forms with database >> data entered on the forms. Imagine a form with small type, boxes and >> spacing that must be exactly as on the official form and data from >> the database on the form as printed to pdf. One nice thing about >> Filemaker is that its reporting ability is very flexible. >> >> I also have an extensive solution with approx 50 tables/databases to >> run my small business. I built a calendar, contacts, clients, >> timelog, and billing solution. I have been bumping my head against >> Filemaker Pro's 50 database limit for years - server would allow you >> 125 databases for about $1000. For those of you with no experience >> with Filemaker, a database is a table. Each file only has one table >> and all layouts/reports/forms and scripts are in the same file. This >> setup has pros and cons that are irrelevant now. > > I'm not familiar with FileMaker, but my understanding is that it can > communicate with other databases via ODBC. Would it not be possible to > keep your investment (at least for a while) in the front end forms and > convert to PostgreSQL as the data store? > I have some colleagues who have tried to do this, but it seems that this (at least in their hands) is a bit of pie-in-the-sky. I'd love to hear otherwise, but I'm not sure this is a viable solution, particularly using Filemaker 5, which is not truly relational. Sean
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: