On Nov 16, 2005, at 4:17 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 14:19:28 -0500,
> Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org> wrote:
>>
>> if they're poking around the process table, just change the name of
>> the postmaster executable and the socket it creates to "johnsdb" or
>> some such.
>
> I think you need to be careful with that. The last time I checked,
> postmaster
> checked what name it was running under and behaved differently
> depending
> on what it was called.
well obviously you would have to take that into account when
renaming... :-)
in my head I had thought of it but just didn't type it out....